Philosophical Anthropology Essays -- Philosophy Essays

Philosophical AnthropologyABSTRACT Philosophers faecal matternot avoid addressing the question of whether philosophic anthropology (that is, specifically philosophical inquiry about gay temper and human phenomenon) is possible. any(prenominal) answer must be articulated in the context of the nature and function of philosophy. In other words, philosophical anthropology must be delimitate as an account of the nature of the subject of philosophical thinking. I turn over that if philosophical thinkers admit that they are beings in nature, culture, and history, then the possibility of a uniquely philosophical theory of human nature and human phenomenon should be discarded. Rather, philosophys catalytic and integrative role in human cognition should be stressed.Anthropological interests on the part of philosophers can be explained on assorted levels. Since thinking in general is reflective, philosophical thinkers must naturally be interested in instinct the nature of humans, which they themselves are, including the nature of their own thinking. exactly non-philosophical theorists can also be reflective enough to seek an understanding of human nature and the nature of their characteristic thinking. On a deeper level, with their acknowledgment that cognitive functions including philosophical thinking are characteristically human, philosophers may succeed to reflect upon how such functions are conditioned by human conditions. only if such conditions can be addressed by empirical sciences as well, sometimes with greater method actingological care or seriousness than can be found among some philosophers, as in cognitive psychological science or cultural anthropology. If, in the course of the development of philosophy as a discipline, human experience becomes the primary thematic ... ...y is partly interpretable by different influences from outside philosophy. The juxtaposition and comparison of, for instance, the views of Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, Hume , Kant, Marx and Nietzsche on human nature should make us despair of finding a philosophical essence of anthropological views. The distinct contribution that philosophy as a discipline can make to the understanding of humans is not so much special content or even a method as its ethos of valuing critical thinking and integration of human knowledge. Philosophical anthropology, as a special area of a unique discipline, should be held suspect. thither only is a dimension to each inquiry where many, if not all, of the questions philosophers provide are significant. The mission of philosophy is to make all human inquiries, including the anthropological, maximally reflective in the given cultural situation.